PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies1 citations

Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
LGLiliana GalliLLLaura LukaMFMassimo Piergiuseppe Franchi

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the safety and outcomes of transvaginal specimen extraction compared to transabdominal extraction in laparoscopic procedures.
  • Systematic literature search across EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until April 2025.
  • Included 25 studies with a total of 2751 patients grouped by design, specialty, and extraction method.
  • Analyzed outcomes related to postoperative pain, complications, and hospital stays.
  • TVSE resulted in lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.98, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.66).
  • Postoperative complications were reduced with TVSE (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.89).
  • Higher cosmetic satisfaction was reported with TVSE (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgery, specimen retrieval can require enlarging abdominal incisions, reducing the minimally invasive benefits. Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) can offer a safer, more cosmetic alternative for women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and outcomes of TVSE compared with transabdominal extraction, regardless of surgical indication. METHODS: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.98, 95%CI -1.30 to -0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference -1.04, 95%CI -1.77 to -0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ. CONCLUSION: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Galli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fece83b9154b0b82875f94https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2026.2653713
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What is the impact of simulation on the learning of hysteroscopic skills by residents and medical students? A systematic review2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range2014 · 11,900 citations
  3. 3The impact of simulated intra-abdominal movement on basic laparoscopic skills development: a feasibility study2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease2023 · 164 citations
  5. 5Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center case series2020 · 14 citations