Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis compare surgical outcomes of transvaginal and transabdominal techniques, indicating improved results for transvaginal extraction.
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgery, specimen retrieval can require enlarging abdominal incisions, reducing the minimally invasive benefits. Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) can offer a safer, more cosmetic alternative for women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and outcomes of TVSE compared with transabdominal extraction, regardless of surgical indication. METHODS: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.98, 95%CI -1.30 to -0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference -1.04, 95%CI -1.77 to -0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ. CONCLUSION: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: