PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2012Research Synthesis Methods1,145 citationsOpen Access

Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression

View Full Paper
IWIan R. WhiteJBJessica BarrettDJDan Jackson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Network meta-analysis (multiple treatments meta-analysis, mixed treatment comparisons) attempts to make the best use of a set of studies comparing more than two treatments. However, it is important to assess whether a body of evidence is consistent or inconsistent. Previous work on models for network meta-analysis that allow for heterogeneity between studies has either been restricted to two-arm trials or followed a Bayesian framework. We propose two new frequentist ways to estimate consistency and inconsistency models by expressing them as multivariate random-effects meta-regressions, which can be implemented in some standard software packages. We illustrate the approach using the mvmeta package in Stata. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff4bf2581c6e761e7762cbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper