Does pulsed Doppler ultrasound accurately measure ascending aortic blood velocity, volume, and acceleration compared to electromagnetic and thermodilution methods in humans?
Pulsed Doppler ultrasound can non-invasively and reliably record relative beat-by-beat changes in left ventricular ejection in humans, though absolute values may differ from invasive measurements.
The volume, velocity, and acceleration of ascending aortic blood were measured in man using a pulsed Doppler ultrasound instrument, with online spectral analysis and offline computer processing of velocity data. This system was firstly validated in a test rig capable of generating pulsatile flow of talc particles in water at physiological velocities and accelerations in a model aorta. Doppler measurements correlated well (r greater than or equal to 0.90) with simultaneous electromagnetic measurements of stroke volume, peak ejection velocity, and maximum acceleration in this rig. In vivo validation was performed firstly by comparing simultaneous Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output (Q) measurements; this yielded the following regression equation: Doppler Q = 0.90 X thermodilution Q + 0.03 litre.min-1, r = 0.92; n = 38. Beat by beat measurements were then validated against simultaneous invasive aortic blood velocity measurements made using a Mills electromagnetic cathetertip probe. When paced single beats of different size were compared within subjects the correlation coefficients between Doppler and electromagnetic measurements averaged 0.89 for stroke volume, 0.91 for peak ejection velocity, and 0.79 for maximum acceleration in five subjects. The absolute values for velocity and acceleration from the Doppler system differed significantly from the absolute values given by the electromagnetic system and this difference was not consistent between subjects. It is concluded that the Doppler system can non-invasively record relative changes in left ventricular ejection in man.
Innes et al. (Thu,) studied this question.