Implementation of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform significantly improved the appropriate VTE prevention rate from 11.67% to 53.11% (p<0.001).
Observational
Yes
Does a CDR-based VTE quality control platform improve VTE prevention practices in hospitalised patients in county-level hospitals?
Implementation of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform significantly improved VTE prevention practices and compliance in county-level hospitals in China.
Absolute Event Rate: 53.11% vs 11.67%
p-value: p=<0.001
To enhance venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and management in county-level hospitals, we developed a VTE quality control platform leveraging clinical databases and Clinician Workstations. The platform is characterised by simplified construction, cost-effectiveness and a user-friendly interface enabling precise real-time monitoring of VTE prevention measures in hospitalised patients. Comparative analysis of pre-implementation and post implementation data revealed significant improvements in key metrics: VTE bleeding risk assessment rate (1.33% vs 7.43%, p<0.001), basic prevention compliance (20.87% vs 50.38%, p<0.001), mechanical prevention utilisation (24.60% vs 27.37%, p=0.002) and appropriate prevention rate (11.67% vs 53.11%, p<0.001). The platform effectively optimised VTE prevention practices, demonstrating ease of deployment, affordability and operational efficiency—making it a scalable and practical solution for county-level hospitals in China.
Zang et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Venous thromboembolism (VTE). CDR-based VTE quality control platform vs. Pre-implementation was evaluated on Appropriate prevention rate (p=<0.001). Implementation of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform significantly improved the appropriate VTE prevention rate from 11.67% to 53.11% (p<0.001).