Printable piezoelectric materials are emerging as a cornerstone of next-generation sensing, actuation, and energy harvesting technologies, driven by the need for lightweight, flexible, and digitally manufactured transducers. Conventional ceramic piezoelectrics offer exceptional electromechanical performance but require high-temperature sintering and exhibit intrinsic brittleness, limiting their integration with soft or unconventional substrates. Polymeric piezoelectrics, in contrast, provide mechanical compliance and low-temperature processability yet suffer from lower crystallinity, reduced piezoelectric coefficients, and limited thermal stability. These contrasting characteristics have catalyzed the development of functional piezoelectric inks—ceramic, polymeric, and hybrid formulations engineered for additive manufacturing techniques such as direct ink writing, stereolithography, screen printing, and inkjet printing. This review systematically examines the material compositions, dispersion chemistries, printing requirements, thermal treatment pathways, and poling strategies that govern the performance of printed piezoelectric transducers. By comparing ceramic-based, polymer-based, and hybrid systems, we reveal the fundamental trade-offs between printability, crystallinity, mechanical compliance, and electromechanical response, and map how these trade-offs shape device design across wearable electronics, soft robotics, and structural health monitoring. Finally, we highlight emerging approaches—including surface functionalization, low-temperature crystallization, liquid-phase sintering, and engineered ceramic–polymer interfaces—that offer promising routes to bridge the gap between printability and high piezoelectric performance.
Manuel Reis Carneiro (Fri,) studied this question.