Leadless pacemaker implantation was associated with a shorter total procedure duration (39 vs 45 minutes) but longer fluoroscopy time compared to conduction system pacing.
Cohort (n=103)
Yes
Does leadless pacemaker implantation compared to conduction system pacing improve procedural outcomes and electrical performance in patients requiring single-chamber ventricular pacing with preserved LVEF?
In patients requiring single-chamber pacing, leadless pacemakers offer shorter procedure times with 100% acute success, while conduction system pacing provides more physiological ventricular activation but with lower acute success and longer procedure times.
Absolute Event Rate: 39% vs 45%
p-value: p=0.048
Subin等人（Sun，）在左室射血分数保持的单腔心室起搏中进行了一个队列研究（n=103）。评估无导线起搏器（LPM）与传导系统起搏（CSP）在总手术持续时间（分钟）上的比较（p=0.048）。与传导系统起搏相比，无导线起搏器植入与较短的总手术持续时间相关（39分钟对45分钟）但荧光透视时间较长。