Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
INTRODUCTION: The multiple bar approach was developed to cover broader and heavier teenager/adult chest wall deformities. We designed the cross-bar technique to achieve remodeling of the entire chest wall. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of cross-bar and its benefits over the parallel bar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cross-bar technique involves placing two bars diagonally and then cross on the target. The primary purposes are to double the lifting forces by making two bars converge on a single target to lift inflexible heavy chest wall depressions or cover lower lateral areas. The results of the cross-bar and parallel bar are compared for the indications, postrepair outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: = 1.0), although the cross-bar group was more rigid and complex. There was no bar displacement or reoperation in both groups. CONCLUSION: The cross-bar technique is as safe and effective as the parallel-bar technique, even though it was selected to correct more complexities. The cross-bar technique could be a method for complex PE deformities for remodeling of the entire chest wall.
Hyun et al. (Tue,) studied this question.