PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1990Circulation285 citations

Determinants of survival and left ventricular performance after mitral valve replacement. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.

View Full Paper
MCMichael H. CrawfordJSJulianne SouchekCOCharles Oprian

Structured PICO

How do postoperative left ventricular size and systolic function relate to survival and clinical status in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement?

P
Population
104 patients (48 with mitral regurgitation [MR], 33 with mitral stenosis [MS], and 23 with mixed MS/MR) undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement
I
Intervention
Mitral valve replacement
C
Comparator
Preoperative baseline (before and after surgery comparison)
O
Outcome
Survival and clinical status (New York Heart Association class) in relation to postoperative left ventricular size and systolic functionhard clinical

Postoperative left ventricular dilation and reduced ejection fraction are strong predictors of mortality and poor clinical status following isolated mitral valve replacement.

Abstract

To determine how survival and clinical status were related to left ventricular (LV) size and systolic function after mitral valve replacement, 104 patients (48 mitral regurgitation MR, 33 mitral stenosis MS, and 23 MS/MR) with isolated mitral valve replacement were evaluated before and after surgery. Preoperative hemodynamic abnormalities by cardiac catheterization were improved 6 months after surgery in all three patient groups. The patients with MR exhibited reductions in LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (117 +/- 51 to 89 +/- 27 ml/m2, p less than 0.001) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.56 +/- 0.15 to 0.45 +/- 0.13, p less than 0.001); however, the ratio of forward stroke volume to end-diastolic volume increased (0.32 +/- 0.21 to 0.45 +/- 0.17, p less than 0.001) because of the elimination of regurgitant volume. Survival analysis revealed that mortality was significantly higher in MS or MS/MR patients with postoperative EDVI more than 101 ml/m2 (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.042, respectively) and in MR patients with postoperative EF less than or equal to 0.50 (p less than 0.031). Also, the majority of patients with MR or MS/MR and postoperative EDVI more than 101 ml/m2 and EF less than or equal to 0.50 were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the patients with MR revealed that the strongest predictor of postoperative EF was preoperative EF (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Crawford et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03bffcd2c35e4200e96b68https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1173
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper