PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Remote Sensing of Environment0 citationsOpen Access

Advancing river bathymetry mapping through physics-informed neural networks and SWOT satellite observations

View Full Paper
YRYoutong RongPBPaul BatesJNJeff Neal

Key Points

  • This research investigates how to accurately map riverbed topography using satellite data and physics-informed machine learning techniques.
  • Utilized Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for estimating riverbed elevation from SWOT satellite observations.
  • Employed a dual-network architecture to differentiate between bed elevation and flow-dependent water depth.
  • Conducted synthetic experiments and validated findings on real rivers, including the Severn and Thames.
  • Achieved reconstruction accuracy of centimeters for smooth river profiles using as few as 12 high-flow overpasses.
  • Demonstrated Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) below 0.3 m compared to ground-truth surveys.
  • Found that uncertainties in Manning's roughness significantly affect accuracy, introducing errors up to ±2.4 m.

Abstract

River bathymetry—the submerged channel topography invisible to conventional remote sensing and costly to survey at scale—remains unmapped for most of the world's rivers, critically constraining hydrodynamic flood modelling. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission now delivers global Water Surface Elevation (WSE) observations, opening a path to infer riverbed elevation from space. Yet recovering bathymetry from WSE alone is fundamentally ill-posed: without additional constraints, infinitely many bed configurations produce identical surface responses. We present a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework that mitigates this ill-posedness by assimilating multi-temporal SWOT overpass across diverse flow regimes, treating bed elevation as the sole unknown while prescribing Manning's roughness, discharge, and channel width. A dual-network architecture separates the time-invariant bed elevation from flow-dependent water depth, embedding Gradually Varied Flow (GVF) physics as a differentiable constraint. Synthetic experiments across 24 bed profiles achieve centimetre reconstruction accuracy for smooth morphologies, degrading for abrupt features at the identifiability limits of one-dimensional hydraulics. Validation on the Severn and Thames demonstrates that as few as 12 high-flow overpasses—roughly 10% of the available record—reproduce full-dataset accuracy, with Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) below 0.3 m relative to ground-truth surveys. Critically, reconstruction accuracy is governed primarily by hydraulic parameter uncertainty rather than SWOT observational limitations: Manning's roughness variations alone introduce errors of ±2.4 m, an order of magnitude beyond those from sampling density or measurement noise (±0.8 m). This framework charts a course from sporadic field campaigns to continuous, satellite-driven bathymetric monitoring for operational flood forecasting. • PINNs constrained by flow law for SWOT-based riverbed estimation. • Dual networks separate time-invariant bed from flow-dependent depth. • Manning's roughness uncertainty exceeds SWOT data constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05659da550a87e60a1df45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115481
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper