PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Rhotic variation in Moroccan Judeo-Arabic

View Full Paper
SGShirley Mordechai (née Gabber)

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze rhotic sound production in Moroccan Judeo-Arabic to document phonetic variations.
  • Acoustic analysis of rhotic variants recorded from ten native speakers from Marrakech.
  • Tasks included retelling a culturally relevant story and reading a 36-item word list.
  • Statistical modeling using mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to assess influences on rhotic realization.
  • Three rhotic variants identified: tap, trill, and approximant, with high inter-speaker variation.
  • Statistical modeling showed significant effects of phoneme identity and linguistic context on rhotic realization.
  • Findings highlight discrepancies between traditional phonological descriptions and observed phonetic reality.

Abstract

Descriptions of rhotic sounds in Moroccan Arabic dialects often lack phonetic evidence and can be inconsistent, with some sources classifying the rhotic as a trill (e.g., Caubet 1993), and others identifying it as a tap (e.g., Heath 2002). Moroccan Arabic phonology includes a contrast between singleton and geminate rhotics and a quasi-phonemic contrast between plain and emphatic rhotics (Freeman 2016). This study presents the first acoustic analysis of rhotic production in Moroccan Judeo-Arabic, an endangered dialect spoken predominantly by elderly Moroccan Jews. It examines inter-speaker variation and potential effects of phoneme identity, word position, and vocalic environment. Ten native speakers from Marrakech were recorded completing tasks including retelling a culturally relevant story and reading a 36-item word list embedded in sentence frames, developed in collaboration with community members. Acoustic analysis included spectrogram labeling, comparisons of rhotic variant frequencies, and mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression. Three rhotic variants—tap, trill, and approximant—were identified, with substantial inter-speaker variation in distribution. Statistical modeling assesses the influence of linguistic context and phoneme identity on rhotic realization. Findings contribute to the phonetic documentation of under-described dialects and to broader discussions of mismatches between phonological descriptions of rhotics and phonetic reality (e.g., Anselme 2022).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shirley Mordechai (née Gabber) (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567fda550a87e60a204b1https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0041449
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper