Randomized trial investigates rhotic sound variation in Moroccan Judeo-Arabic, suggesting new phonetic insights.
Descriptions of rhotic sounds in Moroccan Arabic dialects often lack phonetic evidence and can be inconsistent, with some sources classifying the rhotic as a trill (e.g., Caubet 1993), and others identifying it as a tap (e.g., Heath 2002). Moroccan Arabic phonology includes a contrast between singleton and geminate rhotics and a quasi-phonemic contrast between plain and emphatic rhotics (Freeman 2016). This study presents the first acoustic analysis of rhotic production in Moroccan Judeo-Arabic, an endangered dialect spoken predominantly by elderly Moroccan Jews. It examines inter-speaker variation and potential effects of phoneme identity, word position, and vocalic environment. Ten native speakers from Marrakech were recorded completing tasks including retelling a culturally relevant story and reading a 36-item word list embedded in sentence frames, developed in collaboration with community members. Acoustic analysis included spectrogram labeling, comparisons of rhotic variant frequencies, and mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression. Three rhotic variants—tap, trill, and approximant—were identified, with substantial inter-speaker variation in distribution. Statistical modeling assesses the influence of linguistic context and phoneme identity on rhotic realization. Findings contribute to the phonetic documentation of under-described dialects and to broader discussions of mismatches between phonological descriptions of rhotics and phonetic reality (e.g., Anselme 2022).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirley Mordechai (née Gabber) (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: