PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2014Stroke197 citationsOpen Access

Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin Versus Warfarin in Patients With Stroke and Aortic Arch Plaques

View Full Paper
PAPierre AmarencoSDStephen M. DavisEJE. Jones

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Severe atherosclerosis in the aortic arch is associated with a high risk of recurrent vascular events, but the optimal antithrombotic strategy is unclear. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled, open-labeled trial, with blinded end point evaluation (PROBE design) tested superiority of aspirin 75 to 150 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d (A+C) over warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio 2-3) in patients with ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral embolism with plaque in the thoracic aorta>4 mm and no other identified embolic source. The primary end point included cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolism, vascular death, or intracranial hemorrhage. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 month and then every 4 months post randomization. RESULTS: The trial was stopped after 349 patients were randomized during a period of 8 years and 3 months. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the primary end point occurred in 7.6% (13/172) and 11.3% (20/177) of patients on A+C and on warfarin, respectively (log-rank, P=0.2). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.61; P=0.5). Major hemorrhages including intracranial hemorrhages occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the A+C and warfarin groups, respectively. Vascular deaths occurred in 0 patients in A+C arm compared with 6 (3.4%) patients in the warfarin arm (log-rank, P=0.013). Time in therapeutic range (67% of the time for international normalized ratio 2-3) analysis by tertiles showed no significant differences across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Because of lack of power, this trial was inconclusive and results should be taken as hypothesis generating. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00235248.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amarenco et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a086b34ef79633196e8b628https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.113.004251
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Aortic arch atheroma and the risk of stroke2006 · 23 citations
  2. 2Effect of treatment on the incidence of stroke and other emboli in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque2002 · 272 citations
  3. 3The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials.1985 · 639 citations
  4. 4Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack2001 · 3,194 citations
  5. 5The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials.1997 · 523 citations