PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2005AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology209 citations

MRI-based finite-element analysis of left ventricular aneurysm

View Full Paper
JWJoseph C. WalkerMRMark B. RatcliffePZPeng Zhang

Key Result

Adding contractile stress transverse to the muscle fiber in finite-element models improved myocardial strain agreement with experimental measurements by 27% (RMS error 0.054 vs 0.074, P<0.05).

Structured PICO

P
Population
5 sheep with anteroapical myocardial infarction (25% of LV mass) 22 weeks prior
I
Intervention
Tagged MRI and finite-element (FE) modeling incorporating active cross-fiber stress
C
Comparator
FE analysis with only uniaxial contracting stress
O
Outcome
Myocardial strain agreement between FE model predictions and experimental measurementssurrogate

Active cross-fiber stress development is an integral part of LV systole, and its inclusion in finite-element models significantly improves the accuracy of myocardial strain predictions in LV aneurysms.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.054% vs 0.074%

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Tagged MRI and finite-element (FE) analysis are valuable tools in analyzing cardiac mechanics. To determine systolic material parameters in three-dimensional stress-strain relationships, we used tagged MRI to validate FE models of left ventricular (LV) aneurysm. Five sheep underwent anteroapical myocardial infarction (25% of LV mass) and 22 wk later underwent tagged MRI. Asymmetric FE models of the LV were formed to in vivo geometry from MRI and included aneurysm material properties measured with biaxial stretching, LV pressure measurements, and myofiber helix angles measured with diffusion tensor MRI. Systolic material parameters were determined that enabled FE models to reproduce midwall, systolic myocardial strains from tagged MRI (630 +/- 187 strain comparisons/animal). When contractile stress equal to 40% of the myofiber stress was added transverse to the muscle fiber, myocardial strain agreement improved by 27% between FE model predictions and experimental measurements (RMS error decreased from 0.074 +/- 0.016 to 0.054 +/- 0.011, P < 0.05). In infarct border zone (BZ), end-systolic midwall stress was elevated in both fiber (24.2 +/- 2.7 to 29.9 +/- 2.4 kPa, P < 0.01) and cross-fiber (5.5 +/- 0.7 to 11.7 +/- 1.3 kPa, P = 0.02) directions relative to noninfarct regions. Contrary to previous hypotheses but consistent with biaxial stretching experiments, active cross-fiber stress development is an integral part of LV systole; FE analysis with only uniaxial contracting stress is insufficient. Stress calculations from these validated models show 24% increase in fiber stress and 115% increase in cross-fiber stress at the BZ relative to remote regions, which may contribute to LV remodeling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walker et al. (2005) studied Left ventricular aneurysm post-myocardial infarction (n=5). Finite-element models including transverse contractile stress vs. Finite-element models with only uniaxial contracting stress was evaluated on Myocardial strain agreement (RMS error) between FE model predictions and experimental measurements (p=<0.05). Adding contractile stress transverse to the muscle fiber in finite-element models improved myocardial strain agreement with experimental measurements by 27% (RMS error 0.054 vs 0.074, P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a087e0dab15ea61dee8e1cfhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01226.2004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper