PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026European Journal of Cancer1 citationsOpen Access

Technical recommendations from a large-scale French Delphi consensus: a step toward European harmonization of ctDNA analysis

AHAlexandre HarléLPLéa PayenALAlexandra Lespagnol

Key Points

  • To develop standardized technical recommendations for ctDNA analysis to improve reproducibility and reliability across laboratories in Europe.
  • Conducted the largest European Delphi consensus initiative involving 39 high-volume molecular platforms with a 71% response rate.
  • Utilized iterative anonymous surveys and live voting to gather expert opinions on ctDNA analysis.
  • Established 37 recommendations based on 80% agreement, covering pre-analytical, analytical, bioinformatics, and post-analytical phases.
  • Achieved over 90% alignment with ESMO, ELBS, ISLB, and AMP/CAP guidelines.
  • Recommendations include mandatory use of unique molecular identifiers and systematic positive controls.
  • Framework aims to ensure greater confidence in ctDNA liquid biopsy results for diagnostic and theragnostic applications.

Abstract

BackgroundCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing by liquid biopsy has become a cornerstone of precision oncology, yet technical heterogeneity across laboratories continues to hamper reproducibility and clinical reliability. MethodsTo address this challenge, the Groupe Franais de Cytogntique Oncologique (GFCO) conducted the largest European Delphi consensus initiative to date on technical standardization of ctDNA analysis, involving 39 high-volume molecular platforms (71 % response rate). ResultsUsing iterative anonymous surveys and live voting, we established 37 recommendations (80 % agreement) spanning pre-analytical, analytical, bioinformatics, and post-analytical phases.Key J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f consensus points include mandatory use of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) with preference for ligation-based incorporation (95-100 %), double centrifugation with high-speed second spin, systematic positive controls mimicking ctDNA characteristics, leukocyte aliquot preservation for clonal haematopoiesis evaluation, and explicit reporting of variant allele frequency, CHIP risk, and limitations of negative results.These recommendations demonstrate more than 90 % alignment with recent ESMO (2022), ELBS (2025), ISLB (2025), and AMP/CAP guidelines while providing more prescriptive, operationally oriented specifications on critical steps (e.g., UMI implementation, plasma storage, centrifugation parameters) that address real-world gaps repeatedly identified in European external quality assessment schemes. ConclusionsBy offering a robust, ready-to-implement framework that complements and refines existing international standards, this consensus paves the way for broader harmonization of ctDNA testing across Europe and beyond, ultimately strengthening confidence in liquid biopsy results for routine diagnostic and theragnostic applications in oncology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harlé et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095a877880e6d24efe08c3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116791
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reference materials and External Quality Assessment for Liquid Biopsy assays: Expert Opinions from the European Liquid Biopsy Society ctDNA Workshop2026
  2. 2Abstract 978: Functional characterization and a real-world clinical laboratory pilot of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health’s (FNIH) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) quality control materials (QCMs)2024
  3. 3Implementing the ESMO recommendations for the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays in routine clinical application/diagnostics2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4The ctDNA Paradigm: Dynamic Observation, Quantitative Analysis, and Interpretive Limits in Precision Oncology2026
  5. 5Liquid profiling for patients with advanced cancer is ready for clinical integration2024 · 2 citations