PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Modular TEBAC Proof of the Birch–Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture over Q: Determinant Comparison, Arithmetic Bridge, and Leading-Term Assembly

View Full Paper
TKTosho Lazarov Karadzhov

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish a modular TEBAC proof of the Birch–Swinnerton–Dyer conjecture for elliptic curves over rational numbers.
  • Utilized the upstream chain from BSD-I to BSD-V to construct the proof.
  • Ensured determinant comparison and arithmetic bridge were non-circular and independent from analytic data.
  • Performed leading-term transfer to assemble the classical Birch–Swinnerton–Dyer constant.
  • Demonstrated that the order of the L-function at s=1 equals the rank of the elliptic curve E over Q.
  • Provided an explicit formula relating the leading term of L(E,s) and the rank, incorporating factors like the regulator and Selmer group.
  • Confirmed non-dependence of major components in the proof, ensuring robustness of claims.

Abstract

This preprint presents a modular TEBAC proof of the Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer conjecture for elliptic curves over \ (Q\). The proof is organized through the upstream chain-I-II-III-IV-V. \ BSD-I supplies the centered spectral carrier at \ (s=1\). BSD-II constructs the determinant and comparison package through corrected trace, Mellin--zeta determinant, parity/reference factor, and completed quotient rigidity. BSD-III reads the central analytic order from this determinant comparison. BSD-IV constructs the arithmetic bridge from the central spectral space to the Mordell--Weil real vector space, proves the H1--H5 exactness, response, height, and regulator statements, and keeps the residual Selmer/Sha contribution visible. BSD-V performs the completed-to-classical leading-term transfer and assembles the classical BSD constant ledger. The main theorem asserted in the manuscript isₒ=₁ L (E, s) =rank E (Q), , for \ (r=rank E (Q) \), ^ (r) (E, 1) r!=E\, Reg (E) \, | (E) |\, ₚ cₚ (E) |E (Q) ₓ₎ₑₒ|². \ The paper includes explicit dependency and non-circularity checks: the determinant comparison does not use analytic rank or Mordell--Weil data; the arithmetic bridge does not assume the rank formula, \ ( (E) =0\), or a Neron--Tate normalization; and the terminal assembly does not repair upstream determinant, bridge, height, or regulator statements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c5d7880e6d24efe2674https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20181346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper