Modular proof shows the relationship between the order of L-functions and elliptic curve ranks, implying significant algebraic insights.
This preprint presents a modular TEBAC proof of the Birch--Swinnerton--Dyer conjecture for elliptic curves over \(Q\). The proof is organized through the upstream chain\[{BSD-I}{BSD-II}{BSD-III}{BSD-IV}{BSD-V}.\] BSD-I supplies the centered spectral carrier at \(s=1\). BSD-II constructs the determinant and comparison package through corrected trace, Mellin--zeta determinant, parity/reference factor, and completed quotient rigidity. BSD-III reads the central analytic order from this determinant comparison. BSD-IV constructs the arithmetic bridge from the central spectral space to the Mordell--Weil real vector space, proves the H1--H5 exactness, response, height, and regulator statements, and keeps the residual Selmer/Sha contribution visible. BSD-V performs the completed-to-classical leading-term transfer and assembles the classical BSD constant ledger. The main theorem asserted in the manuscript is\[ordₛ₌₁ L(E,s)=rank E(Q),\]and, for \(r=rank E(Q)\),\[{L⁽ʳ⁾(E,1)}{r!}={Ω_E\,Reg(E)\,|(E)|\,∏_p c_p(E)}{|E(Q)ₜₒᵣₛ|^2}.\] The paper includes explicit dependency and non-circularity checks: the determinant comparison does not use analytic rank or Mordell--Weil data; the arithmetic bridge does not assume the rank formula, \((E)=0\), or a Neron--Tate normalization; and the terminal assembly does not repair upstream determinant, bridge, height, or regulator statements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: