PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 2, 2021Angiology19 citationsOpen Access

Biomarkers of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Microvascular Angina: A Narrative Review

VSVincenzo SucatoECEgle CorradoGMGirolamo Manno

Key Result

Blood biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and oxidative stress may facilitate the non-invasive screening and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Structured PICO

Can easily obtainable blood biomarkers reflect the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with microvascular angina?

P
Population
Patients with microvascular angina (MVA) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD)
I
Intervention
Blood biomarkers (categorized into endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, oxidative stress, and mixed mechanisms)
O
Outcome
Relationship between blood biomarkers and the pathophysiology of CMD/MVAsurrogate

This review highlights the potential of blood biomarkers to serve as non-invasive diagnostic tools for coronary microvascular dysfunction, potentially reducing the need for invasive reactivity testing.

Abstract

The current gold standard for diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in the absence of myocardial diseases, whose clinical manifestation is microvascular angina (MVA), is reactivity testing using adenosine or acetylcholine during coronary angiography. This invasive test can be difficult to perform, expensive, and harmful. The identification of easily obtainable blood biomarkers which reflect the pathophysiology of CMD, characterized by high reliability, precision, accuracy, and accessibility may reduce risks and costs related to invasive procedures and even facilitate the screening and diagnosis of CMD. In this review, we summarized the results of several studies that have investigated the possible relationships between blood biomarkers involved with CMD and MVA. More specifically, we have divided the analyzed biomarkers into 3 different groups, according to the main mechanisms underlying CMD: biomarkers of "endothelial dysfunction," "vascular inflammation," and "oxidative stress." Finally, in the last section of the review, we consider mixed mechanisms and biomarkers which are not included in the 3 major categories mentioned above, but could be involved in the pathogenesis of CMD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sucato et al. (2021) conducted a review in Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and microvascular angina (MVA). Blood biomarkers was evaluated. Blood biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and oxidative stress may facilitate the non-invasive screening and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a5837fdd00ab7863dcb89https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197211034267
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Arterial Stiffness Is Related to Systemic Inflammation in Essential Hypertension2005 · 346 citations
  2. 2Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction2007 · 1,608 citations
  3. 3Noninvasive assessment of preclinical atherosclerosis2006 · 105 citations
  4. 4Circulating and Tissue Endothelin Immunoreactivity in Advanced Atherosclerosis1991 · 957 citations
  5. 5Cardiac syndrome X2005 · 36 citations