PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2001AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology112 citations

Accuracy of echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular mass in mice

View Full Paper
KCKeith A. CollinsCKClaudia E. KorcarzSSSanjeev G. Shroff

Key Result

The two-dimensional area-length method showed higher correlation (r=0.92 vs 0.81) and accuracy (bias 1.4% vs 36.7%) than the M-mode method for estimating left ventricular mass in mice.

Structured PICO

Does the two-dimensional area-length method improve the accuracy of left ventricular mass estimation compared to the M-mode method in mice?

P
Population
91 CD-1 mice (38 normal, 44 aortic banded, and 9 inherited dilated cardiomyopathy) with LV sizes and weights ranging from 62-210 mg
I
Intervention
Two-dimensional echocardiography using the area-length method (and truncated ellipsoid estimation) to estimate left ventricular mass
C
Comparator
Standard M-mode echocardiography method
O
Outcome
Accuracy and correlation of left ventricular mass estimates compared with necropsy weightssurrogate

The two-dimensional area-length echocardiographic method provides a more accurate and reproducible noninvasive estimate of left ventricular mass in mice compared to the standard M-mode method.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r = 0.92 vs 0.81

Abstract

Genetically modified mice have created the need for accurate noninvasive left ventricular mass (LVM) measurements. Recent technical advances provide two-dimensional images adequate for LVM calculation using the area-length method, which in humans is more accurate than M-mode methods. We compared the standard M-mode and area-length methods in mice over a wide range of LV sizes and weights (62-210 mg). Ninety-one CD-1 mice (38 normal, 44 aortic banded, and 9 inherited dilated cardiomyopathy) were imaged transthoracically (15 MHz linear transducer, 120 Hz). Compared with necropsy weights, area-length measurements showed higher correlation than the M-mode method (r = 0.92 vs. 0.81), increased accuracy (bias +/- SD: 1.4 +/- 27.1% vs. 36.7 +/- 51.6%), and improved reproducibility. There was no significant difference between end-systolic and end-diastolic estimates. The truncated ellipsoid estimation produced results similar in accuracy to the area-length method. Whereas current echocardiographic technology can accurately and reproducibly estimate LVM with the two-dimensional, area-length formula in a variety of mouse models, additional technological improvements, rather than refinement of geometric models, will likely improve the accuracy of this methodology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Collins et al. (2001) studied Left ventricular mass measurement (n=91). Two-dimensional area-length method vs. Standard M-mode method was evaluated on Correlation and accuracy of LVM estimates compared with necropsy weights (r = 0.92 vs 0.81). The two-dimensional area-length method showed higher correlation (r=0.92 vs 0.81) and accuracy (bias 1.4% vs 36.7%) than the M-mode method for estimating left ventricular mass in mice.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dda6be51d8d6d0c09dc3dhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.5.h1954
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass and Systolic Function in Mice1995 · 222 citations
  2. 2Magnetic resonance imaging accurately estimates LV mass in a transgenic mouse model of cardiac hypertrophy1998 · 110 citations
  3. 3Magnetic resonance microimaging for noninvasive quantification of myocardial function and mass in the mouse1998 · 182 citations
  4. 4Developmental changes of cardiac function and mass assessed with MRI in neonatal, juvenile, and adult mice2000 · 167 citations
  5. 5Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function in conscious and anesthetized mice1999 · 368 citations