The two-dimensional area-length method showed higher correlation (r=0.92 vs 0.81) and accuracy (bias 1.4% vs 36.7%) than the M-mode method for estimating left ventricular mass in mice.
Does the two-dimensional area-length method improve the accuracy of left ventricular mass estimation compared to the M-mode method in mice?
The two-dimensional area-length echocardiographic method provides a more accurate and reproducible noninvasive estimate of left ventricular mass in mice compared to the standard M-mode method.
Effect estimate: r = 0.92 vs 0.81
Genetically modified mice have created the need for accurate noninvasive left ventricular mass (LVM) measurements. Recent technical advances provide two-dimensional images adequate for LVM calculation using the area-length method, which in humans is more accurate than M-mode methods. We compared the standard M-mode and area-length methods in mice over a wide range of LV sizes and weights (62-210 mg). Ninety-one CD-1 mice (38 normal, 44 aortic banded, and 9 inherited dilated cardiomyopathy) were imaged transthoracically (15 MHz linear transducer, 120 Hz). Compared with necropsy weights, area-length measurements showed higher correlation than the M-mode method (r = 0.92 vs. 0.81), increased accuracy (bias +/- SD: 1.4 +/- 27.1% vs. 36.7 +/- 51.6%), and improved reproducibility. There was no significant difference between end-systolic and end-diastolic estimates. The truncated ellipsoid estimation produced results similar in accuracy to the area-length method. Whereas current echocardiographic technology can accurately and reproducibly estimate LVM with the two-dimensional, area-length formula in a variety of mouse models, additional technological improvements, rather than refinement of geometric models, will likely improve the accuracy of this methodology.
Collins et al. (2001) studied Left ventricular mass measurement (n=91). Two-dimensional area-length method vs. Standard M-mode method was evaluated on Correlation and accuracy of LVM estimates compared with necropsy weights (r = 0.92 vs 0.81). The two-dimensional area-length method showed higher correlation (r=0.92 vs 0.81) and accuracy (bias 1.4% vs 36.7%) than the M-mode method for estimating left ventricular mass in mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: