PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 14, 1999Circulation222 citationsOpen Access

Ventilatory and Heart Rate Responses to Exercise

View Full Paper
MRMark RobbinsGFGary S. FrancisFPFredric J. Pashkow

Key Result

High ventilatory response to exercise (RR 3.20; 95% CI 1.95-5.26; P<0.0001) and low chronotropic index independently predicted mortality in heart failure patients over 1.5 years.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the relative prognostic significance of chronotropic and ventilatory exercise responses in patients with severe heart failure.
  • Followed 470 consecutive heart failure patients not receiving beta-blockers or intravenous inotropes for 1.5 years following metabolic stress testing, alongside 17 healthy controls.
  • Directly measured peak V̇o2 and V̇e/V̇co2, calculated chronotropic index, and classified abnormal values based on cohort quartile cutoffs (lowest 25th percentile for chronotropic index and peak V̇o2; highest 25th percentile for V̇e/V̇co2).
  • During 1.5 years of follow-up, 71 deaths occurred in the 470-patient heart failure cohort.
  • Multivariate analysis showed that high V̇e/V̇co2 (adjusted RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.26, P < 0.0001) and low chronotropic index (adjusted RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.19, P = 0.0009) were the only independent predictors of mortality.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=487)

PICO

P
Population
Heart failure (n=487)
I
Intervention / Comparator
High ventilatory response (V̇e/V̇co2) and low chronotropic index vs Normal/lower ventilatory response and normal/higher chronotropic index
O
Primary Outcome
Death — RR 3.20 (1.95 to 5.26), p=<0.0001

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 3.20 (95% CI 1.95 to 5.26)

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Background —An abnormally low chronotropic response and an abnormally high ventilatory response (V̇ e /V̇ co 2 ) to exercise are common in patients with severe heart failure, but their relative prognostic impacts have not been well explored. Methods and Results —Consecutive patients with heart failure referred for metabolic stress testing who were not taking β-blockers or intravenous inotropes (n=470) were followed for 1.5 years. The chronotropic index was calculated while peak V̇ o 2 and V̇ e /V̇ co 2 were directly measured. Chronotropic index and peak V̇ o 2 were considered abnormal if in the lowest 25th percentiles of the patient cohort, whereas V̇ e /V̇ co 2 was considered abnormal if in the highest 25th percentile. For comparative purposes, a group of 17 healthy controls underwent metabolic testing as well. Compared with controls, heart failure patients had markedly abnormal ventilatory and chronotropic responses to exercise. In the heart failure cohort, there were 71 deaths. In univariate analyses, predictors of death included high V̇ e /V̇ co 2 , low chronotropic index, low V̇ o 2 , low resting systolic blood pressure, and older age. Nonparametric Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated that by dividing the population according to peak V̇ e /V̇ co 2 and peak V̇ o 2 , it is possible to identify low, intermediate, and very high risk groups. In multivariate analyses, the only independent predictors of death were high V̇ e /V̇ co 2 (adjusted relative risk RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.26, P <0.0001) and low chronotropic index (adjusted RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.19, P =0.0009). Conclusions —The ventilatory and chronotropic responses to exercise are powerful and independent predictors of heart failure mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robbins et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=487). High ventilatory response (V̇e/V̇co2) and low chronotropic index vs. Normal/lower ventilatory response and normal/higher chronotropic index was evaluated on Death (RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.26, p=<0.0001). High ventilatory response to exercise (RR 3.20; 95% CI 1.95-5.26; P<0.0001) and low chronotropic index independently predicted mortality in heart failure patients over 1.5 years.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e2f98358c8502d7d09bb5https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.24.2411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper