PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2022Heart Rhythm O263 citationsOpen Access

Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group

View Full Paper
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Pugazhendhi VijayaramanElectrophysiology
ÓCÓscar CanoElectrophysiologySPShunmuga Sundaram PonnusamyElectrophysiology

Key Result

Left bundle branch area pacing was successful in 88% of patients with heart failure and RBBB, yielding clinical and echocardiographic responses in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=121)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improve electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with right bundle branch block and reduced LVEF?

P
Population
121 patients with heart failure, right bundle branch block (RBBB), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Mean age 74 ± 12 years, 25% female, 49% ischemic cardiomyopathy.
I
Intervention
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)
O
Outcome
Feasibility (success rate), procedural/pacing/ECG parameters, clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class), and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in LVEF)surrogate

LBBAP is a feasible alternative to biventricular pacing that improves LVEF and narrows QRS duration in heart failure patients with RBBB and reduced LVEF.

Abstract

BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing.MethodsLBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed.ResultsLBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V6 of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response.ConclusionLBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing. LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed. LBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V6 of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response. LBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vijayaraman et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with right bundle branch block and reduced left ventricular systolic function (n=121). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was evaluated on Clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class). Left bundle branch area pacing was successful in 88% of patients with heart failure and RBBB, yielding clinical and echocardiographic responses in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e9be6a7f61df77cc86e0ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Permanent His Bundle Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Right Bundle Branch Block2018 · 175 citations
  2. 2Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is not associated with a reduction in mortality or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with non-left bundle branch block QRS morphology: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials2015 · 92 citations
  3. 3Bilateral Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Achieve Physiological Conduction System Activation2020 · 39 citations
  4. 4Rationale and Design of the Randomized Multicentre His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE-HF) Trial2018 · 47 citations
  5. 5Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for the Prevention of Heart-Failure Events2009 · 3,173 citations