Research in discursive psychology examines naturally occurring interactions to see how people deal with psychological matters, such as emotions.In the current article, we use examples from a study conducted in a helpline setting to illustrate how discursive psychology provides insights into the moral dimensions of anxiety.Although individuals may use expressions of worry to emphasize the seriousness of a problem in their lives, they also counter a hearing of their problem as existing solely in their mind-that is, as anxiety.Our findings show that callers work to maintain credibility while presenting themselves as anxious and that call takers can support them by acknowledging anxiety as an external force that can overpower individuals, even when they are aware of its nature.By demonstrating how the morality of attributing a problem to the subject can be negotiated through interactional practices that distribute responsibility, this study highlights the value of analyzing emotion in naturally occurring interactions.
Iversen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.