PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 20131,481 citationsOpen Access

Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?

JBJimmy BaUniversity of TorontoRCRich CaruanaMicrosoft (United States)

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Currently, deep neural networks are the state of the art on problems such as speech recognition and computer vision. In this extended abstract, we show that shallow feed-forward networks can learn the complex functions previously learned by deep nets and achieve accuracies previously only achievable with deep models. Moreover, in some cases the shallow neural nets can learn these deep functions using a total number of parameters similar to the original deep model. We evaluate our method on the TIMIT phoneme recognition task and are able to train shallow fully-connected nets that perform similarly to complex, well-engineered, deep convolutional architectures. Our success in training shallow neural nets to mimic deeper models suggests that there probably exist better algorithms for training shallow feed-forward nets than those currently available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ba et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ec2d3c7b730ed75f99a1bhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1312.6184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper