PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1992Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology55 citations

Effect of the Atrioventricular Relationship on Atrial Refractoriness in Humans

View Full Paper
HCHugh CalkinsRERafel El-AtassiALAngel R. León

Key Result

Altering the atrioventricular interval to decrease right atrial pressure did not change atrial refractoriness or the frequency of atrial fibrillation induction.

Structured PICO

Does varying the AV interval alter atrial refractoriness or the frequency of atrial fibrillation induction in patients without structural heart disease?

P
Population
27 patients without structural heart disease
I
Intervention
Atrioventricular (AV) pacing at a cycle length of 400 msec with varying AV intervals (0, 120, and 160 msec)
C
Comparator
Comparison between different AV intervals (0, 120, and 160 msec)
O
Outcome
Atrial effective refractory period (ERP) and absolute refractory period (ARP)surrogate

Alterations in atrial pressure induced by varying the AV interval do not change atrial refractoriness or the frequency of atrial fibrillation induction in patients without structural heart disease, suggesting contraction-excitation feedback may not be a primary mechanism for atrial arrhythmias in this population.

Abstract

Atrial arrhythmias occur frequently in the setting of increased atrial size and pressure. This may result from contraction-excitation feedback. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. Twenty-seven patients without structural heart disease participated in the study. In each patient the atrial effective (ERP) and absolute refractory period (ARP) were measured during AV pacing at a cycle length of 400 msec and AV intervals of 0, 120, and 160 msec. The ERP was defined as the longest extrastimulus coupling interval that failed to capture with an extrastimulus current strength of twice the stimulation threshold. The ARP was defined in a similar manner with an extrastimulus current strength of 10 mA. The ERP and ARP were determined during continuous pacing using the incremental extrastimulus technique. A subset of patients had the pacing protocol performed during autonomic blockade. As the AV interval was increased from 0 to 160 msec, the peak right atrial pressure decreased from 16 +/- 4 mmHg to 7 +/- 3 mmHg and the mean right atrial pressure decreased from 7 +/- 3 mmHg to 3 +/- 22 mmHg (P less than 0.001). The atrial ERP and ARP did not change with alterations in the AV interval. There was no difference in the frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. Similar results were obtained during autonomic blockade. These findings suggests that the phenomenon of contraction-excitation feedback may not be of importance in the development of atrial arrhythmias in patients without structural heart disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Calkins et al. (1992) studied Without structural heart disease (n=27). Varying atrioventricular (AV) intervals during pacing vs. Intra-patient comparison across different AV intervals was evaluated on Atrial effective (ERP) and absolute refractory period (ARP), and frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. Altering the atrioventricular interval to decrease right atrial pressure did not change atrial refractoriness or the frequency of atrial fibrillation induction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eda5f218372ada647c73ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb06844.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper