PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2022EP Europace27 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of the antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a high-risk population

View Full Paper
UCUzma ChaudhryRBRasmus BorgquistJSJ. G. Smith

Structured PICO

Does an antibacterial envelope reduce local infection in patients undergoing CIED implantation?

P
Population
526 patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=144 envelope group, n=382 matched control cohort)
I
Intervention
Antibacterial envelope (antibiotic-eluting absorbable envelope) during CIED implantation
C
Comparator
Matched cohort of CIED patients without the envelope
O
Outcome
Occurrence of local infectionsafety

The use of an antibacterial envelope during CIED implantation significantly reduces local infections, particularly in high-risk patients identified by a PADIT score >7.

Abstract

AIMS: Infection is a serious complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. An antibiotic-eluting absorbable envelope has been developed to reduce the infection rate, but studies investigating the efficacy and a reasonable number needed to treat in high-risk populations for infections are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four patients undergoing CIED implantation who received the antibacterial envelope were compared with a matched cohort of 382 CIED patients from our institution. The primary outcome was the occurrence of local infection, and secondary outcomes were any CIED-related local or systemic infections, including endocarditis, and all-cause mortality. The results were stratified by a risk score for CIED infection, PADIT. The envelope group had a higher PADIT score, 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 3.9 ± 3.0 (P 7 points) PADIT score, 0 vs. 9.9% (P = 0.01). The total CIED-related infections were similar between groups, 6.3% compared with 5.0% (P = 0.567). Mortality after 1600 days of follow-up did not differ between groups, 22.9 vs. 26.4%, P = 0.475. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the clinical efficacy of an antibacterial envelope in the prevention of local CIED infection in patients with a higher risk according to the PADIT score. In an effort to improve cost-benefit ratios, ration of use guided by the PADIT score is advocated. Further prospective randomized studies in high-risk populations are called for.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaudhry et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee1dae29b511e9f2293ddhttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac119
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for the Prevention of Heart-Failure Events2009 · 3,173 citations
  2. 2Use of healthcare claims to validate the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk score2021 · 36 citations
  3. 3Use of antibiotic envelopes to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infections: A meta‐analysis2018 · 30 citations
  4. 4Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection2019 · 401 citations
  5. 5European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections—endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)2019 · 420 citations