PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Circulation Journal110 citationsOpen Access

Edoxaban vs. Warfarin in East Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation – An ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Subanalysis –

TYTakeshi YamashitaYKYukihiro KoretsuneYYYuejin Yang

Key Result

Higher-dose edoxaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (1.34% vs 2.62%; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P=0.02) in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=1,943)

Blinding

double-blind, double-dummy

Randomization

randomized

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does edoxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism events compared to warfarin in East Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
1,943 patients aged ≥21 years with documented non-valvular atrial fibrillation and CHADS score ≥2 from East Asia (Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea).
I
Intervention
Once-daily edoxaban higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) regimen, with a 50% dose reduction for patients with creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min, weight ≤60 kg, or receiving strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors.
C
Comparator
Warfarin dose-adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0.
O
Outcome
Stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE)composite

In East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, edoxaban provides superior efficacy for stroke prevention and superior safety regarding major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90)

Absolute Event Rate: 1.34% vs 2.62%

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the multinational, double-blind, double-dummy ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 phase 3 study, once-daily edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients from East Asia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients aged ≥21 years with documented AF and CHADS score ≥2 were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) regimen or warfarin dose-adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/min, weighing ≤60 kg, or receiving strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors at randomization or during the study received a 50% dose reduction of edoxaban or matched placebo. This prespecified subanalysis included 1,943 patients from Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea. The annualized rate of stroke/SEE for higher-dose edoxaban was 1.34% vs. 2.62% for warfarin (hazard ratio HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.31-0.90, P=0.02) and 2.52% for lower-dose edoxaban (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.63-1.54, P=0.93). Compared with warfarin (4.80%), major bleeding was significantly reduced for the higher-dose (2.86%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, P=0.011) and lower-dose regimens (1.59%; HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.54, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily edoxaban provided similar efficacy to warfarin while reducing major bleeding risk in the East Asian population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yamashita et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=1,943). edoxaban vs. warfarin was evaluated on stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90, p=0.02). Higher-dose edoxaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (1.34% vs 2.62%; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P=0.02) in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a129dddc031bb6829a6fba5https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-15-1082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper