PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1988Circulation281 citationsOpen Access

Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance.

View Full Paper
JTJames D. ThomasGWGerard WilkinsCCChristopher Y.P. Choong

Key Result

Predictions of mitral pressure half-time including compliance and pressure correlated better after valvotomy (r=0.52-0.66, p<0.05) than predictions based only on valve area (r=0.05-0.28, p=NS).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=18)

Structured PICO

Is mitral pressure half-time an accurate independent measure of mitral valve area immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy?

P
Population
18 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvotomy, and an in vitro model of the left heart
I
Intervention
Percutaneous mitral valvotomy and hemodynamic assessment
C
Comparator
Theoretical predictions of mitral pressure half-time assuming dependence only on valve area versus predictions including chamber compliance and pressure
O
Outcome
Correlation between predicted and observed mitral pressure half-time (T1/2)surrogate

Mitral pressure half-time is an unreliable measure of mitral valve area immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy due to its dependence on chamber compliance and transmitral gradient.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r = 0.52-0.66

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Mitral pressure half-time (T1/2) is widely used as an independent measure of mitral valve area in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvotomy. However, fluid dynamics theory predicts T1/2 to be strongly dependent on chamber compliance and the peak transmitral gradient, which are variables that change dramatically with valvotomy. These theoretical predictions were tested in an in vitro model of the left heart where valve area, chamber compliance, and initial gradient were independently adjusted. Measured T1/2 was observed to vary inversely with orifice area and directly with net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial pressure gradient. Theoretical predictions of T1/2 agreed with observed values with r = 0.998. To test this theory in vivo, the hemodynamic tracings of 18 patients undergoing mitral valvotomy were reviewed. Predictions were made for T1/2 assuming dependence only on valve area; these showed some correlations before valvotomy (r = 0.48-0.64, p less than 0.05) but none after valvotomy (r = 0.05-0.28, p = NS). Predictions for T1/2 based on the theoretical derivation (and thus including compliance and pressure in their calculation) were much better: before valvotomy, r = 0.93-0.96, p less than 0.0001; after valvotomy, r = 0.52-0.66, p less than 0.05. These data indicate that T1/2 is not an independent inverse measure of mitral valve area but is also directly proportional to net chamber compliance and the square root of the initial transmitral gradient. These other factors render T1/2 an unreliable measure of mitral valve area in the setting of acute mitral valvotomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Percutaneous mitral valvotomy (n=18). Mitral pressure half-time (T1/2) measurement vs. Theoretical derivation including compliance and pressure was evaluated on Correlation of predicted vs observed T1/2 after valvotomy (r = 0.52-0.66, p=<0.05). Predictions of mitral pressure half-time including compliance and pressure correlated better after valvotomy (r=0.52-0.66, p<0.05) than predictions based only on valve area (r=0.05-0.28, p=NS).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13dd2cb0a95fa053890dd6https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.78.4.980
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Atrioventricular Pressure Half-Time1968 · 111 citations
  2. 2Mitral Valve Area: Measurement Soon After Catheterization1963 · 22 citations
  3. 3Hemodynamic factors that affect calculated orifice areas in the mitral hancock xenograft valve.1980 · 57 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of the Severity of Mitral Stenosis and Regurgitation1966 · 39 citations
  5. 5Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves1987 · 107 citations