PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Egyptian Journal of Bronchology0 citationsOpen Access

A multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation pathway for hospitalized patients with chronic lung disease and post-COVID syndrome: a prospective controlled cohort study

AZAibo ZhengKSKai SunSMShengjun Ma

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation pathway for hospitalized patients with chronic lung illness and post-COVID syndrome.
  • 360 hospitalized patients with chronic lung disease and post-COVID syndrome were enrolled, with 120 receiving integrated multidisciplinary care and 240 receiving usual care.
  • Primary outcomes measured included changes in PaCO₂, FEV₁% predicted, and CT-assessed residual radiological abnormality extent.
  • Data analyses employed adjusted regression and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW).
  • Integrated care resulted in significant improvements in PaCO₂ (adjusted β − 0.98 mmHg, P < 0.001), FEV₁% predicted (adjusted β 2.35 % points, P < 0.001), and CT-assessed abnormality extent (adjusted β − 0.55 % points, P < 0.001).
  • The integrated care group showed higher patient-reported quality of life and increased walking distance, while reducing inflammation markers (CRP and ESR).
  • At 6 months, sleep quality improved, and medication use for symptoms decreased, with similar rates of rehospitalization and acute exacerbation between groups.

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) and post-COVID syndrome suffer from multidimensional impairment that is often incompletely addressed by pharmacotherapy alone. We evaluated a ward-based multidisciplinary pathway integrating pharmacotherapy, psychological support, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Methods In this prospective controlled cohort study, 360 hospitalized patients with CLD and post-COVID syndrome received integrated multidisciplinary care ( n = 120) or usual care ( n = 240). The primary outcomes were changes in PaCO₂, FEV₁% predicted, and CT-assessed residual radiological abnormality extent. Patient-reported outcomes, functional capacity, inflammation, and 6-month follow-up data were also assessed. Analyses used adjusted regression and IPTW. Results Integrated care was associated with greater improvements in the three primary outcomes: PaCO₂, adjusted β − 0.98 mmHg (95% CI − 1.21 to − 0.75; P < 0.001); FEV₁% predicted, adjusted β 2.35% points (95% CI 1.53 to 3.17; P < 0.001); and CT-assessed residual abnormality extent, adjusted β − 0.55% points (95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.24; P < 0.001). Integrated care was also associated with greater improvements in SGRQ score, SAS score, 15-minute walking distance, CRP, ESR, and sleep-quality score. The composite early clinical benefit rate was higher in the integrated-care group than in the usual-care group, with an adjusted OR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.21 to 3.01; P = 0.006). At 6 months, sleep quality was better and symptom-related medication use was lower, while rehospitalisation, acute exacerbation, and CT progression rates were similar between groups. Conclusions The integrated pathway was associated with broader short-term clinical improvement and lower symptom-related treatment burden at follow-up, although rehospitalisation, acute exacerbation, and CT progression rates were similar between groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7a80e02ee3982d3253ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-026-00587-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper