This study investigated the localization accuracy of Grad-CAM as an Explainable AI (XAI) technique for industrial inspection, specifically evaluating it on the WM811K semiconductor wafer defect dataset — a large-scale, publicly available collection of 25, 519 labeled wafer maps. Localization performance was measured using the Top-10% Intersection over Union (IoU) metric on a held-out test sample (N = 3828), yielding a baseline accuracy of 0. 129. A consistent radial attribution bias was observed across both Grad-CAM and XGrad-CAM, with both methods producing structurally similar bias profiles, suggesting the bias reflects a property of the model’s learned representations rather than a gradient-weighting artifact. To address the radial attribution bias, the authors implemented a radial suppression method, which improved the average Top-10% IoU by 19. 4% (from 0. 129 to 0. 155), verified through a two-tailed paired t-test (p 0. 001). Class-level analysis revealed significant improvements for edge-ring defects while other defect types remained stable. Finally, an oracle-based refinement demonstrated that geometric representation characteristics account for a substantial portion of residual localization errors, establishing an upper bound of 0. 278 IoU.
Dudeja et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: