PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2001220 citations

Scoring Pairwise Genomic Sequence Alignments

View Full Paper
FCFrancesca ChiaromonteVYVon Bing YapWMWilliam L. Miller

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The parameters by which alignments are scored can strongly affect sensitivity and specificity of alignment procedures. While appropriate parameter choices are well understood for protein alignments, much less is known for genomic DNA sequences. We describe a straightforward approach to scoring nucleotide substitutions in genomic sequence alignments, especially human-mouse comparisons. Scores are obtained from relative frequencies of aligned nucleotides observed in alignments of non-coding, non-repetitive genomic regions, and can be theoretically motivated through substitution models. Additional accuracy can be attained by down-weighting alignments characterized by low compositional complexity. We also describe an evaluation protocol that is relevant when alignments are intended to identify all and only the orthologous positions. One particular scoring matrix, called HOXD70, has proven to be generally effective for human-mouse comparisons, and has been used by the PipMaker server since July, 2000. We discuss but leave open the problem of effectively scoring regions of strongly biased nucleotide composition, such as low G + C content.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chiaromonte et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15ada95347fbb173a02171https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812799623_0012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nucleic Acid Research1967 · 374 citations
  2. 2Biological sequence analysis probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids1998 · 3,670 citations