PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1993Journal of Hypertension660 citations

Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability

View Full Paper
AFA. FrattolaGPGianfranco ParatiCCCesare Cuspidi

Key Result

Long-term 24-hour blood pressure variability at initial evaluation was significantly associated with the severity of end-organ damage at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (P<0.05).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=73)

Structured PICO

Does 24-hour blood pressure variability predict future end-organ damage in patients with essential hypertension?

P
Population
73 patients with essential hypertension of variable severity
I
Intervention
24-hour blood pressure variability assessed via intra-arterial continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Oxford technique)
O
Outcome
Severity of end-organ damage quantified by a score (including echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mass index) at follow-upsurrogate

This study provides longitudinal evidence that 24-hour blood pressure variability is an independent predictor of future end-organ damage in hypertensive patients.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the prognostic value of 24-h blood pressure averages and 24-h blood pressure variability. DESIGN: After an initial thorough clinical and laboratory evaluation which included 24-h continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, a group of hypertensive patients were re-examined after an average of 7.4 years. End-organ damage at the follow-up visit was related to different measures of blood pressure levels and variability obtained at the initial or the follow-up visit or both. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with essential hypertension of variable severity, in whom ambulatory blood pressure was monitored intra-arterially for 24 h (Oxford technique) were re-examined at a follow-up visit (including echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mass index) 1-13 years later (mean 7.4 years). The severity of end-organ damage was quantified by a score and related to clinic blood pressure at follow-up and to (1) clinic blood pressure, (2) 24-h blood pressure mean, (3) 24-h short-term and long-term blood pressure variability, and (4) end-organ damage, all assessed at the initial visit (multiple regression analysis). RESULTS: The set of independent variables considered was significantly related to end-organ damage at follow-up (R = 0.51). The individual variables most important in determining end-organ damage at follow-up were clinic blood pressure at the follow-up visit (P < 0.01), the initial level of end-organ damage (P < 0.05) and long-term blood pressure variability (among half-hour standard deviation of 24-h mean blood pressure) at the initial evaluation (P < 0.05). The prognostic individual weight of the other haemodynamic parameters considered was less and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that the level of blood pressure achieved by treatment and the degree of end-organ damage at the time of initial evaluation are important determinants of future end-organ damage related to hypertension. They also constitute the first longitudinal evidence that the cardiovascular complications of hypertension may depend on the degree of 24-h blood pressure variability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frattola et al. (1993) conducted a cohort in Essential hypertension (n=73). 24-hour blood pressure variability was evaluated on Severity of end-organ damage at follow-up (p=<0.05). Long-term 24-hour blood pressure variability at initial evaluation was significantly associated with the severity of end-organ damage at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1719a287c007abbc0558c5https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199310000-00019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper