PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2018PlateletsOpen Access

Not all light transmission aggregation assays are created equal: qualitative differences between light transmission and 96-well plate aggregometry

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Do responses to platelet agonists and antagonists differ between classical light transmission aggregometry and 96-well plate aggregometry?

Comparison

96-well plate aggregometry vs Classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA)

Design

Review

Key result

96-well plate aggregometry and classical light transmission aggregometry yield different responses to platelet agonists and antagonists, demonstrating that the assays are not interchangeable.

Authors

MCMelissa V. ChanPLP. D. M. LeadbeaterSWSteve P. Watson

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Assay-specific interpretation is required for platelet testing; leaves open standardization needs for consistent clinical and research use.

Structured PICO

Do responses to platelet agonists and antagonists differ between classical light transmission aggregometry and 96-well plate aggregometry?

I
Intervention
96-well plate aggregometry
C
Comparator
Classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA)
O
Outcome
Platelet aggregation responses to agonists and antagonistssurrogate

Classical light transmission aggregometry and 96-well plate aggregometry are not interchangeable and yield qualitatively different responses to platelet agonists and antagonists.

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2018) conducted a review in Platelet function testing. 96-well plate aggregometry vs. Classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA) was evaluated on Platelet aggregation responses to agonists and antagonists. 96-well plate aggregometry and classical light transmission aggregometry yield different responses to platelet agonists and antagonists, demonstrating that the assays are not interchangeable.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a178b905fdf2a7b88aa1f3ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2018.1466388
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share