PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 28, 2006Diabetes262 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Intensive Glycemic Treatment on Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetic Participants of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study

PCPatricia A. ClearyTOTrevor J. OrchardSGSaul Genuth

Key Result

Prior intensive diabetes treatment was associated with significantly lower geometric mean CAC scores and a lower prevalence of CAC >200 compared with conventional treatment.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,205)

Structured PICO

Does intensive glycemic treatment reduce coronary artery calcification in patients with type 1 diabetes?

P
Population
1,205 patients with type 1 diabetes from the DCCT/EDIC cohort
I
Intervention
Intensive diabetes treatment for 6.5 years during the DCCT
C
Comparator
Conventional diabetes treatment during the DCCT
O
Outcome
Coronary artery calcification (CAC) measured with computed tomography (CT) at approximately 7-9 years after the end of the DCCTsurrogate

Intensive glycemic control in type 1 diabetes is associated with reduced long-term coronary artery calcification, driven primarily by lower HbA1c levels.

Abstract

The Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, an observational follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) type 1 diabetes cohort, measured coronary artery calcification (CAC), an index of atherosclerosis, with computed tomography (CT) in 1,205 EDIC patients at approximately 7-9 years after the end of the DCCT. We examined the influence of the 6.5 years of prior conventional versus intensive diabetes treatment during the DCCT, as well as the effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors, on CAC. The prevalences of CAC >0 and >200 Agatston units were 31.0 and 8.5%, respectively. Compared with the conventional treatment group, the intensive group had significantly lower geometric mean CAC scores and a lower prevalence of CAC >0 in the primary retinopathy prevention cohort, but not in the secondary intervention cohort, and a lower prevalence of CAC >200 in the combined cohorts. Waist-to-hip ratio, smoking, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, before or at the time of CT, were significantly associated with CAC in univariate and multivariate analyses. CAC was associated with mean HbA(1c) (A1C) levels before enrollment, during the DCCT, and during the EDIC study. Prior intensive diabetes treatment during the DCCT was associated with less atherosclerosis, largely because of reduced levels of A1C during the DCCT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cleary et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Type 1 diabetes (n=1,205). Intensive diabetes treatment vs. Conventional diabetes treatment was evaluated on Coronary artery calcification (CAC) >0 and >200 Agatston units. Prior intensive diabetes treatment was associated with significantly lower geometric mean CAC scores and a lower prevalence of CAC >200 compared with conventional treatment.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a189ab7985da83d54918ca5https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper