PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Clinics and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Non-Invasive Monitoring of Hemodialysis Patients: Challenges and Benefits in the Real World

View Full Paper
OSO. SafarVHViktor HorvathÁKÁrpád Kézdi

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the challenges and benefits of using non-invasive methods to monitor cardiac function in hemodialysis patients.
  • 40 patients with ESRD on chronic hemodialysis were approached; 18 enrolled from September 2024 to July 2025.
  • Holter ECG recording median duration was 84.65 hours; cardiac ultrasound examinations were conducted.
  • Hourly blood gas samples were collected during the second dialysis session.
  • One-third of the enrolled patients withdrew consent for the investigation.
  • No significant differences in QT and QTc intervals between dialysis and non-dialysis days (p=0.184, p=0.446).
  • Clinically significant changes in QT and QTc intervals were observed during the first 3 hours of dialysis.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Hemodialysis involves rapid electrolyte shifts and sudden fluid removal, which can affect ventricular repolarization and trigger arrhythmias in patients with ESRD. To enhance patient care, it is crucial to regularly assess cardiac function using noninvasive and painless methods, such as Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and routine cardiac ultrasound. These evaluations may inform improved prevention strategies to reduce the risk of elevated cardiovascular mortality rates. Methods: In total, 40 patients with ESRD on chronic hemodialysis (HD) were approached, and only 18 were enrolled from September 2024 to July 2025. Detailed medical information was provided, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient. The median duration of Holter ECG recording was 84.65 h, and cardiac ultrasound examinations were conducted. Blood gas samples were collected hourly during the second dialysis session. Results: Surprisingly, one-third of the patients opted to withdraw their consent for this painless investigation. No significant differences were observed in the QT and QTc intervals between the dialysis and non-dialysis days (p = 0.184 and p = 0.446, respectively). However, a significant increase was observed during the first 3 h of dialysis when analyzing the intradialytic period. Conclusion: Some patients showed clinically significant changes in QT and QTc intervals during treatment, which could not be confirmed statistically. Although we did not formulate a hypothesis, it is essential to recognize that patient compliance significantly influences the cardiovascular outcomes of individuals undergoing hemodialysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Safar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ed7fab5b468c44180cahttps://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract16060098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effect of Hemodialysis on Electrocardiographic Parameters2014 · 19 citations
  2. 2RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND ELECTROLYTES BEFORE AND AFTER DIALYSIS IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Primary outcomes of the Monitoring in Dialysis Study indicate that clinically significant arrhythmias are common in hemodialysis patients and related to dialytic cycle2018 · 211 citations
  4. 4Risk of sudden cardiac death associated with QRS, QTc, and JTc intervals in the general population2022 · 33 citations
  5. 5Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 20222022 · 2,958 citations