PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2002Prehospital Emergency Care35 citations

Atls P Ractices and S Urvival at R Ural L Evel Iii T Rauma H Ospitals , 1995-1999

View Full Paper
JHJerris R. HedgesAAAnnette L. AdamsMGMary D. Gunnels

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

To determine whether Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) practices characterizing initial resuscitation and interfacility transfer at rural trauma hospitals are associated with risk-adjusted survival.Retrospective, observational analysis of rural injured patient survival. Process-of-care variables were associated with TRISS (trauma and injury severity score)-derived Z-statistics (95% confidence intervals) for high-risk population subsets (defined below).all patients > or = 12 years of age entered into a statewide trauma system, January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1999, and initially presenting to Level III trauma centers (N = 4,961).pronounced dead on arrival (n = 26), directly admitted to hospital (n = 3), and unknown disposition at first hospital (n = 2). Process variables include: intubation in emergency department (ED) given Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 15 ISS-TS, transfer to higher level of care given ISS > 20 and no hypotension TRAN, transfer to higher level of care given GCS < 9 TRAN-GCS.For the high-risk subpopulations, the following Z-scores (with and without an intervention) were found:Some ATLS interventions (BLOOD, TRAN, and TRAN-GCS) are associated with improved survival for selected high-risk subgroups in these 21 rural Level III trauma hospitals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hedges et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a195247fa25ab5db6d95dcfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10903120290938337
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper