PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2012IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering115 citations

An Automatic Patient-Adapted ECG Heartbeat Classifier Allowing Expert Assistance

View Full Paper
MLMariano LlamedoJMJuan Pablo Martí­nez

Key Points

  • To develop and evaluate a patient-adaptable algorithm for ECG heartbeat classification that integrates expert assistance.
  • Utilized a patient-adaptable algorithm combining automatic classifier and clustering algorithms.

Structured PICO

Does a patient-adaptable algorithm with expert assistance improve ECG heartbeat classification performance compared to fully automatic classifiers?

P
Population
Several ECG databases
I
Intervention
Patient-adaptable algorithm for ECG heartbeat classification (combining an automatic classifier and a clustering algorithm with expert assistance)
C
Comparator
Original automatic classifier and other state-of-the-art classifiers
O
Outcome
Classification performance (accuracy A, global sensitivity S, and global positive predictive value P(+))surrogate

A patient-adaptable ECG heartbeat classification algorithm significantly improves accuracy and predictive value with minimal expert assistance compared to fully automatic methods.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a patient-adaptable algorithm for ECG heartbeat classification, based on a previously developed automatic classifier and a clustering algorithm. Both classifier and clustering algorithms include features from the RR interval series and morphology descriptors calculated from the wavelet transform. Integrating the decisions of both classifiers, the presented algorithm can work either automatically or with several degrees of assistance. The algorithm was comprehensively evaluated in several ECG databases for comparison purposes. Even in the fully automatic mode, the algorithm slightly improved the performance figures of the original automatic classifier; just with less than two manually annotated heartbeats (MAHB) per recording, the algorithm obtained a mean improvement for all databases of 6.9% in accuracy A, of 6.5% in global sensitivity S and of 8.9% in global positive predictive value P(+). An assistance of just 12 MAHB per recording resulted in a mean improvement of 13.1% in A, of 13.9% in S, and of 36.1% in P(+). For the assisted mode, the algorithm outperformed other state-of-the-art classifiers with less expert annotation effort. The results presented in this paper represent an improvement in the field of automatic and patient-adaptable heartbeats classification, concluding that the performance of an automatic classifier can be improved with an efficient handling of the expert assistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Llamedo et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a2d369dd58c84b95b6245https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2012.2202662
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper