PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 31, 2026Annals of Surgical Oncology1 citationsOpen Access

The Past, Present, and Future of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
MSMichael StanczykCleveland Clinic Lerner College of MedicineTCTiffany C. CheungCleveland ClinicJLJulie E. LangUniversity of Kentucky

Key Points

  • This review investigates the development and clinical applications of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer management.
  • Examined historical trials including NSABP B-32 and ALMANAC for SLNB outcomes.
  • Evaluated newer techniques such as dual-tracer mapping and targeted axillary dissection to enhance accuracy.
  • Explored ongoing trials and innovations in imaging-guided axillary staging.
  • SLNB shows comparable overall survival and disease-free survival compared to axillary lymph node dissection.
  • Omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection is supported for select patients with limited SLN metastases.
  • Technological advances have led to improved sentinel lymph node identification, reducing false-negative rates.

Abstract

Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the current gold standard for axillary staging for many breast cancer patients, has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for clinically node-negative patients due to lower surgical morbidity while maintaining oncologic safety. Advances in breast cancer surgery, axillary staging, lymphatic mapping, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification techniques have reshaped axillary management and enabled progressive de-escalation of surgical treatment. This review examines the historical development, current clinical applications, and emerging innovations in SLNB. Early randomized trials including the NSABP B-32 and ALMANAC trials established SLNB as a safe alternative to ALND for clinically node-negative patients with comparable overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and regional control while significantly reducing complications such as lymphedema. Subsequent trials including ACOSOG Z0011, IBCSG 23-01, and AMAROS further supported omission of completion ALND (cALND) for selected patients with limited SLN metastases. In the neoadjuvant setting, studies such as ACOSOG Z1071, SENTINA, and SN-FNAC evaluated SLNB accuracy after NAC and informed the development of optimized techniques, including dual-tracer mapping and TAD, to reduce false-negative rates. Technological advances including indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, technetium-99m radiotracers, and superparamagnetic iron oxide tracers have further improved SLN identification. Ongoing trials investigating SLNB omission and imaging-guided axillary staging continue to refine patient selection and advance the shift toward personalized, morbidity-conscious axillary management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stanczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd0845783ba022b6fc564https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19672-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper