PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Cancer Research Communications0 citationsOpen Access

Ceralasertib Monotherapy in Patients with ATM-Altered Advanced Solid Tumors or Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Phase 2a PLANETTE Study

View Full Paper
RARahul R. AggarwalAIAntoine ItalianoSDSusan M. Domchek

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceralasertib in patients with ATM-altered advanced solid tumors or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
  • Phase 2a trial with two cohorts: advanced solid tumors (30 patients) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (15 patients).
  • Patients received ceralasertib 160 mg BID on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle, with efficacy measured by objective and composite response rates.
  • Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety assessments.
  • Cohort A had an objective response rate of 7.1% with one complete and one partial response, while Cohort B showed a composite response rate of 7.7%.
  • In ATM protein loss patients, the objective response rate was 18.2%, with no responses in the composite rate.
  • Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months for both cohorts, with Grade ≥3 adverse events occurring in 50% of Cohort A and 53.3% of Cohort B patients.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ceralasertib is an oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor with preclinical activity in ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-altered cancers. The phase 2a PLANETTE study evaluated ceralasertib in previously treated advanced solid tumors (Cohort A) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Cohort B) with ATM alterations (ATM mutations and/or ATM protein deficiency). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received ceralasertib 160 mg BID on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with centrally confirmed ATM alterations. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Cohort A) or composite response rate (CRR: radiographic response, PSA response, or circulating tumor cell conversion; Cohort B). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: Cohorts A and B included 30 and 15 patients, respectively. ORR (Cohort A) was 7.1% (80% confidence interval CI: 1.9-17.9; n=2/28): one complete response ongoing at 14.1 months (breast cancer) and one partial response ongoing at 7.4 months (endometrial cancer). CRR (Cohort B) was 7.7% (80% CI: 0.8-28.6; n=1/13). In patients with centrally confirmed ATM protein loss, ORR was 18.2% (80% CI: 4.9-41.5; n=2/11) and CRR was 0% (80% CI: 0-28.0; n=0/7). Median PFS was 3.7 months in each cohort (Cohort A, 80% CI: 1.9-5.6; Cohort B, 80% CI: 1.9-not calculable). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 50.0% of Cohort A and 53.3% of Cohort B patients. The most common AEs overall were asthenia/fatigue, nausea, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Ceralasertib monotherapy was tolerated; however, responses were limited. Alternative patient selection and combination treatments are being explored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aggarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc550dee9eb8c0dce6be0https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.crc-26-0184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper