Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Ceralasertib is an oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor with preclinical activity in ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-altered cancers. The phase 2a PLANETTE study evaluated ceralasertib in previously treated advanced solid tumors (Cohort A) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Cohort B) with ATM alterations (ATM mutations and/or ATM protein deficiency). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received ceralasertib 160 mg BID on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with centrally confirmed ATM alterations. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Cohort A) or composite response rate (CRR: radiographic response, PSA response, or circulating tumor cell conversion; Cohort B). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: Cohorts A and B included 30 and 15 patients, respectively. ORR (Cohort A) was 7.1% (80% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-17.9; n=2/28): one complete response ongoing at 14.1 months (breast cancer) and one partial response ongoing at 7.4 months (endometrial cancer). CRR (Cohort B) was 7.7% (80% CI: 0.8-28.6; n=1/13). In patients with centrally confirmed ATM protein loss, ORR was 18.2% (80% CI: 4.9-41.5; n=2/11) and CRR was 0% (80% CI: 0-28.0; n=0/7). Median PFS was 3.7 months in each cohort (Cohort A, 80% CI: 1.9-5.6; Cohort B, 80% CI: 1.9-not calculable). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 50.0% of Cohort A and 53.3% of Cohort B patients. The most common AEs overall were asthenia/fatigue, nausea, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Ceralasertib monotherapy was tolerated; however, responses were limited. Alternative patient selection and combination treatments are being explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aggarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: