PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Annals of General Psychiatry0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
DEDalia Kamal EwisHSHaneen SabetYHYousef Hawas

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rTMS in treating anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.
  • Conducted comprehensive literature search from multiple databases up to May 2025.
  • Included 13 clinical trials with 195 active rTMS and 132 sham treatments.
  • Data pooled using fixed or random-effects models, calculating mean differences and assessing risk of bias.
  • No significant change in BMI for anorexia nervosa patients (MD: 0.19, 95% CI: -0.50, 0.88, P=0.59).
  • Moderate reduction in eating disorder severity (SMD: -0.50, 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.10, p=0.01).
  • Depression symptoms improved with rTMS (SMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.02, p=0.04), while anxiety and other behavioral symptoms did not.

Abstract

Abstract Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), focusing on its impact on psychological, psychopathological, neurocognitive, and behavioral outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included clinical trials involving adult patients with AN or BN treated with rTMS. Data were pooled using fixed or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and NIH tools. Results Thirteen studies were included, yielding a total of n = 195 active rTMS treatments and n = 132 sham treatments. Compared to sham, rTMS did not significantly improve BMI in AN patients (MD: 0.19; 95% CI: -0.50, 0.88; P = 0.59). A significant moderate reduction in eating disorder severity was found in single-arm analysis (31 patients, SMD: -0.50, 95% CI -0.90, -0.10, p = 0.01). Depression improved with rTMS over sham (105 patients, SMD: -0.41, 95% CI -0.81, -0.02, p = 0.04), while anxiety, binge frequency, and vomiting frequency did not. Urge to eat increased in AN (30 patients, MD: 1.20, 95% CI 0.20, 2.21, p = 0.02) and decreased in BN (25 patients, MD: -10.25, 95% CI -15.88, -4.62, p = 0.0004). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions rTMS shows potential in improving eating disorder severity and depressive symptoms in AN, with disorder-specific modulation of food-related urges. Its effects on BMI and behavioral symptoms remain inconclusive. rTMS was well tolerated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ewis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc56bdee9eb8c0dce6d7ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00673-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper