PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Mixture dependent correlation patterns in antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of five hop isolates

View Full Paper
LKL. KoberLKLuca von KargerKCKathrin Castiglione

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the correlation patterns between antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of various hop isolates against specific bacteria and chicken cells.
  • Evaluated five hop isolates using a two-dimensional checkerboard assay.
  • Classified interactions as additive, synergistic, or antagonistic using fractional inhibitory concentrations (∑FIC).
  • Assessed selectivity indices for antibacterial versus cytotoxic effects.
  • Combinations against B. subtilis were predominantly additive (∑FIC = 0.89–1.15).
  • M. luteus exhibited both synergistic (humulone + lupulone, ∑FIC = 0.43) and antagonistic (isohumulone + isoxanthohumol, ∑FIC = 1.53) interactions.
  • Humulone-lupulone showed a selectivity index of 3.2 for M. luteus, indicating favorable antibacterial selectivity.

Abstract

Abstract Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has resulted in the need for the development of alternative strategies for combating pathogens and growth promotion of poultry, including the use of plant-derived compounds such as hop ( Humulus lupulus ) isolates. The present study evaluates the correlation patterns of the biological activity of five major hop isolates (humulone, lupulone, isohumulone, xanthohumol, and isoxanthohumol) against Bacillus subtilis , Micrococcus luteus , and a chicken cell line UMNSAH/DF-1 using a two-dimensional checkerboard assay. Fractional inhibitory concentrations (∑FIC) were used to classify interactions as additive, synergistic, or antagonistic, and selectivity indices assessed antibacterial versus cytotoxic effects. On B. subtilis , combinations were predominantly additive (∑FIC = 0.89–1.15), whereas M. luteus , in contrast, showed variable interactions, including also synergistic (humulone + lupulone, ∑FIC = 0.43 ± 0.18) and antagonistic combinations (isohumulone + isoxanthohumol, ∑FIC = 1.53 ± 0.38), demonstrating the impact of the metabolic resilience of the target organism. Cytotoxicity in UMNSAH/DF-1 cells was largely additive, with synergistic effects observed only for isomerized compounds (∑FIC = 0.50 ± 0.23). Selectivity analysis highlighted humulone-lupulone combinations with selective indices of 3.2 for M. luteus and 1.3 for B. subtilis as most favorable, indicating moderate to good antibacterial selectivity. These results provide novel insights for selecting hop isolate combinations for the development of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs), emphasizing that both compound composition and target organism physiology critically shape efficacy and safety outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kober et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6cddee9eb8c0dce7bd1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55473-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hop leaves: From waste to a valuable source of bioactive compounds – A multidisciplinary approach to investigating potential applications2024 · 18 citations
  2. 2Solubility enhancement and application of cyclodextrins in local drug delivery2019 · 99 citations
  3. 3Species-specific activity of antibacterial drug combinations2018 · 370 citations
  4. 4Chemical constituents and bioactivities of hops ( Humulus lupulus L .) and their effects on beer‐related microorganisms2022 · 34 citations
  5. 5Antagonism between Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal Antibiotics Is Prevalent2014 · 294 citations