Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To explore the knowledge of abortion medications and abortion service provision practices among pharmacy workers in a restrictive country in Southeast Asia. Methods: Between June and July 2012, 170 pharmacy workers operating in the capital city were interviewed about their misoprostol and abortion knowledge and provision practices. To investigate actual provision practices, 193 pharmacies were subsequently visited by fieldworkers posing as abortion clients. After each visit, the ‘mystery clients’ used a standard form to record the information and services they were offered. Results: During interviews, 87.1% of pharmacy workers reported that they receive clients requesting abortion medications. One third (32.5%) of pharmacy workers had heard of misoprostol and 93.9% of these knew it was indicated for abortion. Only 1.8% of pharmacy workers reported that they offer abortion medications, however 49.2% offered medications to mystery clients. Just 9.3% offered misoprostol but none offered the WHO’s recommended regimen. Conclusion: Pharmacy workers in a restrictive capital city in Southeast Asia are providing medical abortion ineffectively and large differences exist between their reported and actual abortion provision practices. Interventions to increase pharmacy worker knowledge of misoprostol use for abortion could be an effective way to improve access to safer termination options.
Okkar Aung (Wed,) studied this question.