PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1976Annals of Human Biology54 citations

Validity of the ultrasonic technique as a method of measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue

View Full Paper
EHEmily M. HaymesHLHerberta M. LundengrenJLJ. L. Loomis

Structured PICO

Does the ultrasonic technique accurately measure subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to skinfold calipers and roentgenograms?

P
Population
37 subjects (20 women and 17 men) for skinfold caliper comparison, and a subset of 18 subjects (6 women and 12 men) for soft-tissue roentgenographic comparison.
I
Intervention
Ultrasonic technique for measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue at abdomen, suprailiac, subscapular, and mid-triceps sites.
C
Comparator
Skinfold caliper technique and soft-tissue roentgenographic technique.
O
Outcome
Correlation between ultrasonic measurements and skinfold caliper or soft-tissue roentgenographic measurements.surrogate

The ultrasonic technique is a valid and reproducible method for measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue, showing high correlation with soft-tissue roentgenograms.

Abstract

Subcutaneous adipose tissue measurements, at abdomen, suprailiac, subscapular, and mid-triceps sites, made with the ultrasonic and skinfold caliper techniques were compared using data from 20 women and 17 men from a pool of subjects of 22 women and 20 men. In addition, comparisons were made between ultrasonic, soft-tissue roentgenographic and skinfold caliper techniques at the suprailiac and mid-triceps sites on 6 women and 12 men. Repeat measurements with the ultrasonic technique produced correlation coefficients of 0-87 and above. Correlations between skinfold caliper and ultrasonic measurements were generally higher among women than men over each of the four sites. A highly significant relationship, r = 0-88, was observed between the ultrasonic measurements and soft-tissue roentgenograms over the mid-triceps site. The correlation between the fat-muscle interface measured on the roentgenogram and ultrasonic measurements at the suprailiac site was 0-78. Multiple echoes and interfaces were observed at the suprailiac site on some subjects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haymes et al. (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20939ba47c2b0806950fb6https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467600001411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper