Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The relationship between memory enhancement and fast (13-16 Hz) versus slow (10-13 Hz) spindle activity during sleep was investigated. DESIGN: Standard polysomnographic recordings were conducted during an adaptation, control nonlearning, and learning night. Automatic spindle detection and measurement was utilized with visual confirmation. SETTING: Participants slept in individual, temperature-controlled bedrooms in a sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy student volunteers (9 women and 3 men, mean age: 22.3 years) participated. INTERVENTIONS: On the learning night, participants completed a presleep learning session on a modified version of mirror-tracing task followed by a postsleep test session. No learning or test sessions were performed on the adaptation and nonlearning nights. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Tracing time was reduced by 6.4 seconds (20.6% +/- 2.07%) from the presleep to the postsleep session. Mean amplitude and duration of fast spindles was greater on the learning night than on the nonlearning night (both P values < 0.05). Skill improvement and fast-spindle activity were positively correlated (density r = 0.76, P < 0.01, amplitude r = 0.69, P < 0.05, and duration r = 0.67, P <0.05). Significant correlations between fast-spindle activity and mirror-tracing performance were also evident for the nonlearning night. There was no significant relationship between mirror-tracing performance and slow-spindle activity on any night. CONCLUSIONS: The thalamocortical network underlying fast-spindle generation may contribute to or reflect plasticity during sleep.
Tamaki et al. (Fri,) studied this question.