PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2020Translational Behavioral Medicine42 citationsOpen Access

Lessons learned from service design of a trial of a digital mental health service: Informing implementation in primary care clinics

View Full Paper
AGAndrea K. GrahamCGCarolyn J. GreeneTPThomas Powell

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Implementing a digital mental health service in primary care requires integration into clinic workflow. However, without adequate attention to service design, including designing referral pathways to identify and engage patients, implementation will fail. This article reports results from our efforts designing referral pathways for a randomized clinical trial evaluating a digital service for depression and anxiety delivered through primary care clinics. We utilized three referral pathways: direct to consumer (e.g., digital and print media, registry emails), provider referral (i.e., electronic health record EHR order and provider recommendation), and other approaches (e.g., presentations, word of mouth). Over the 5-month enrollment, 313 individuals completed the screen and reported how they learned about the study. Penetration was 13%, and direct to consumer techniques, most commonly email, had the highest yield. Providers only referred 16 patients through the EHR, half of whom initiated the screen. There were no differences in referral pathway based on participants' age, depression severity, or anxiety severity at screening. Ongoing discussions with providers revealed that the technologic implementation and workflow design may not have been optimal to fully affect the EHR-based referral process, which potentially limited patient access. Results highlight the importance of designing and evaluating referral pathways within service implementation, which is important for guiding the implementation of digital services into practice. Doing so can ensure that sustained implementation is not left to post-evaluation bridge-building. Future efforts should assess these and other referral pathways implemented in clinical practice outside of a research trial.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Graham et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20fc83d6f0ec57f816d2b4https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Persistently poor outcomes of undetected major depression in primary care1998 · 191 citations
  2. 2Longitudinal investigation of depression outcomes in primary care in six countries: the LIDO Study. Functional status, health service use and treatment of people with depressive symptoms2002 · 215 citations
  3. 3Health and Productivity as a Business Strategy: A Multiemployer Study2009 · 356 citations
  4. 4Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda2010 · 9,253 citations
  5. 5GPs' experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment2007 · 125 citations