PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2026Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning0 citationsOpen Access

Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use, ChatGPT and Academic Integrity: Connecting Findings to Assessment Redesign

HCHan Nee ChongEGEugene Guillian

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore faculty and student perceptions of generative AI and its effects on academic integrity and assessment practices.
  • Cross-sectional survey design was utilized.
  • Data collected from 82 faculty and 190 students.
  • Both quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to assess attitudes and practices related to AI use.
  • Broad recognition of generative AI's potential to enhance learning efficiency and provide feedback.
  • Concerns were raised about academic dishonesty and the impact on critical thinking and writing skills.
  • The study proposes a learning improvement plan for assessment redesign to promote authentic learning processes.

Abstract

This study examines faculty and student perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly ChatGPT, and its implications for academic integrity and assessment design in higher education. Using a cross-sectional survey design, quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 82 faculty and 190 students to explore attitudes, experiences, and practices related to AI use. Findings indicate broad recognition of GenAI’s potential to enhance learning efficiency and feedback, alongside concerns about academic dishonesty and the erosion of critical thinking and writing skills. From an assessment perspective, these concerns highlight the importance of designing tasks that make students’ reasoning and learning processes visible. Based on the findings, the study proposes a learning improvement plan that links evidence to actionable strategies. The study concludes that sustainable integration of generative AI in higher education requires rethinking assessment practices toward authentic, process-oriented approaches that uphold academic standards while leveraging AI to support learning outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2115f6d499ed480b16ef3ahttps://doi.org/10.61669/001c.162793
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Impact of Generative AI on Academic Integrity and Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments2024 · 165 citations
  3. 3How generative artificial intelligence has blurred notions of authorial identity and academic norms in higher education, necessitating clear university usage policies2024 · 65 citations
  4. 4Integrating Generative AI Into University Coursework Assessments – a Student Perspective2026
  5. 5Generative AI in Education: Implications for Integrity, Assessment, Literacy, Policy, and Ethics – A Systematic Review2026