Abstract Understanding the quality of eye-tracking recordings, often characterized using accuracy, precision, and data loss, is crucial for the interpretation of eye tracking data. Eye-tracking data quality can furthermore place fundamental limits on what studies can be conducted with an eye tracker, and one may be required to report eye-tracking data quality when publishing a study. However, how does one determine the quality of eye-tracking data? This article provides an overview of operationalizations of accuracy, precision, and data loss and practical advice for determining eye-tracking data quality. Furthermore, the programming code for calculating various quality metrics for a segment of eye-tracking data is provided in MATLAB, Python, and R. Also provided is ETDQualitizer, a tool designed to enable anyone to easily determine the data quality of their recordings. We provide a version that is browser-based ( https://dcnieho.github.io/ETDQualitizer ) and enables determining eye-tracking data quality without installation or programming, while ensuring data privacy by running entirely locally. ETDQualitizer is further provided as a MATLAB, Python, and R library ( https://github.com/dcnieho/ETDQualitizer ) that can be integrated in one’s analysis scripts. We hope that this article enables any researcher to determine, critically evaluate, and report on eye-tracking data quality, and that it spurs researchers to adopt a data quality perspective in all their future eye-tracking studies.
Niehorster et al. (Tue,) studied this question.