PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1990The American Economist43 citations

Baseball Attendance and the Designated Hitter

View Full Paper
BDBruce R. DomazlickyPKPeter M. Kerr

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Major League Baseball, is a business. As such, professional baseball teams are anxious to improve the nature of the product for profit enhancement purposes. As early as 1928 the use of a designated hitter (DH) had been suggested as a product improvement. Dewtsch et. al. p. 130 Under the DH rule adopted by the American League in 1973, a team is allowed to designate a player who will bat in place of one of the nine players in the lineup. The DH does not play in the field; his contribution is limited to offense only. The optimum strategy is for the DH to bat in place of the weakest hitter in the line-up, typically the pitcher. It should be apparent that the use of a DH will increase the amount of runs scored in a game because of the substitution of a relatively strong hitter for a relatively weak one. This latter point is readily conceded by both proponents and opponents to the rule. If increasing the amount of offense in a baseball game is a genuine product improvement, then demand should increase and revenues should be enhanced.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Domazlicky et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a226380f4540fbb2453cc36https://doi.org/10.1177/056943459003400107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper