PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 5, 1988BMJ36 citationsOpen Access

Treating hypertension in black compared with white non-insulin dependent diabetics: a double blind trial of verapamil and metoprolol.

JCJ.K. CruickshankNANaomi M. AndersonJWJ. Wadsworth

Key Result

Verapamil reduced systolic blood pressure by 8.8 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-15.0) in black and 19.1 mm Hg in white diabetics, while metoprolol had little effect in black patients.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=39)

Blinding

Double blind

Randomization

random order crossover

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does verapamil or metoprolol improve blood pressure differently in black compared with white diabetic patients with hypertension?

P
Population
39 black and white non-insulin dependent diabetic patients with hypertension who completed a crossover trial.
I
Intervention
Slow release verapamil 120 mg or 240 mg twice daily or metoprolol 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily for 6 weeks (crossover design).
C
Comparator
Crossover design comparing verapamil and metoprolol, with placebo control.
O
Outcome
Changes in blood pressure in the two groups taking both drugs.surrogate

Verapamil is more effective than metoprolol for treating hypertension in diabetic patients, though both drugs are less effective in black patients compared to white patients.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare responses of blood pressure to the calcium antagonist verapamil and the beta blocker metoprolol in black compared with white diabetics with hypertension and to monitor urinary albumin excretion in relation to fall in blood pressure. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled, random order crossover trial with four week placebo run in period and two six week active phases separated by a two week placebo washout period. SETTING: Outpatient department of a general hospital in a multiethnic health department. Patients--Diabetic patients with hypertension. Four dropped out before randomisation; 25 black and 14 white patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Patients given slow release verapamil 120 mg or 240 mg twice daily with placebo or metoprolol 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily with placebo. Treatment for diabetes (diet alone or with oral hypoglycaemic drugs) remained unchanged. END POINT: Comparison of changes in blood pressure in the two groups taking both drugs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Metoprolol had little effect on blood pressure in black patients (mean fall 4.0 mm Hg systolic (95% confidence interval -2.5 to 10.4 mm Hg), 4.3 mm Hg diastolic (-0.8 to 9.5)) but more effect in white patients (mean falls 13.4 mm Hg (0.1 to 26.7) and 10.6 mm Hg (4.5 to 16.7) respectively). Verapamil was more effective in both groups, with mean falls of 8.8 mm Hg (2.4 to 15.0) and 8.1 mm Hg (5.0 to 11.2) in black patients and 19.1 mm Hg (5.4 to 32.9) and 11.4 mm Hg (0.9 to 22.0) in white patients. Heart fate fell significantly in black patients taking metoprolol, which suggested compliance with treatment. Metabolic variables were unaltered by either treatment. Plasma renin activity was low in both groups after metoprolol treatment, but change in blood pressure could not be predicted from baseline plasma renin activity. Urinary albumin:creatinine ratio was independently related to baseline blood pressure but not significantly changed by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: beta Blockers alone are not effective in treating hypertension in black diabetics. Verapamil is effective but less so than in white patients. As yet no ideal monotherapy exists for hypertension in black patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cruickshank et al. (1988) conducted an RCT in Hypertension in non-insulin dependent diabetics (n=39). Verapamil and Metoprolol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Changes in blood pressure. Verapamil reduced systolic blood pressure by 8.8 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-15.0) in black and 19.1 mm Hg in white diabetics, while metoprolol had little effect in black patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22ee01c8b9bd7d27cabe60https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6657.1155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper