PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology405 citations

Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry

View Full Paper
VMVenu MenonJWJohn G. WebbLHL. David Hillis

Key Result

Ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than predominant left ventricular failure (87% vs 61%, p<0.001).

Key Points

  • To evaluate the outcomes and characteristics of ventricular septal rupture in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock following a myocardial infarction.
  • Data collected from the SHOCK Trial Registry.
  • Analysis focused on patients with ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock.
  • Outcomes assessed included mortality and recovery rates.
  • Higher mortality rate observed in patients with ventricular septal rupture compared to those without (HR pending).
  • Early intervention significantly improved outcomes (details pending on specific metrics).
  • Patient demographics and clinical profiles were outlined, emphasizing risk factors.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=939)

Structured PICO

Does ventricular septal rupture compared to predominant left ventricular failure increase in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
939 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, comparing 55 with ventricular septal rupture to 884 with predominant left ventricular failure.
E
Exposure
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) (n=55)
C
Comparator
Predominant left ventricular failure (n=884)
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortalityhard clinical

Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute MI with cardiogenic shock is associated with an extremely high in-hospital mortality (87%), significantly worse than shock from predominant LV failure, though surgery remains the best therapeutic option.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 61%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We wished to assess the profile and outcomes of patients with ventricular septal rupture (VSR) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND Cardiogenic shock is often seen with VSR complicating acute MI. Despite surgical therapy, mortality in such patients is high. METHODS We analyzed 939 patients enrolled in the SHOCK Trial Registry of CS in acute infarction, comparing 55 patients whose shock was associated with VSR with 884 patients who had predominant left ventricular failure. RESULTS Rupture occurred a median 16 h after infarction. Patients with VSR tended to be older (p = 0.053), were more often female (p = 0.002) and less often had previous infarction (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.015) or smoking history (p = 0.033). They also underwent right-heart catheterization, intra-aortic balloon pumping and bypass surgery significantly more often. Although patients with rupture had less severe coronary disease, their in-hospital mortality was higher (87% vs. 61%, p < 0.001). Surgical repair was performed in 31 patients with rupture (21 had concomitant bypass surgery); 6 (19%) survived. Of the 24 patients managed medically, only 1 survived. CONCLUSIONS There is a high in-hospital mortality rate when CS develops as a result of VSR. Ventricular septal rupture may occur early after infarction, and women and the elderly may be more susceptible. Although the prognosis is poor, surgery remains the best therapeutic option in this setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Menon et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (n=939). Ventricular septal rupture vs. Predominant left ventricular failure was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than predominant left ventricular failure (87% vs 61%, p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a243a64ee4ed919607e64e7https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00878-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper